<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rock Band Competition Scoring</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jasonrutherford.com/2009/03/rock-band-competition-scoring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jasonrutherford.com/2009/03/rock-band-competition-scoring/</link>
	<description>connecting the thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 04:41:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://jasonrutherford.com/2009/03/rock-band-competition-scoring/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 04:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonrutherford.com/?p=21#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Hey dude, this is pretty awesome. Im gonna encorporate it to our Rock Band Bar Nights and i&#039;ll get back to you on how it worked. Thanks !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey dude, this is pretty awesome. Im gonna encorporate it to our Rock Band Bar Nights and i&#8217;ll get back to you on how it worked. Thanks !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://jasonrutherford.com/2009/03/rock-band-competition-scoring/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonrutherford.com/?p=21#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Great stuff! I&#039;m organizing an RB tournament for next week. Your formulae, while very accurate (esp #2), seem to be a little too much work to figure out on-the-fly as it were, though I&#039;m considering letting the bands submit their songlist beforehand, which would alleviate a lot of the issues.

I&#039;m going to noodle this, and will come back with a post if I devise something that&#039;s simpler, but effective in a more casual setting where there are mass quantities of alcohol involved and even the organizer wants to rock out rather than hang out with a calculator!

Great stuff! Now, I just need to figure out what the best way will be to create the &quot;playoffs&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff! I&#8217;m organizing an RB tournament for next week. Your formulae, while very accurate (esp #2), seem to be a little too much work to figure out on-the-fly as it were, though I&#8217;m considering letting the bands submit their songlist beforehand, which would alleviate a lot of the issues.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to noodle this, and will come back with a post if I devise something that&#8217;s simpler, but effective in a more casual setting where there are mass quantities of alcohol involved and even the organizer wants to rock out rather than hang out with a calculator!</p>
<p>Great stuff! Now, I just need to figure out what the best way will be to create the &#8220;playoffs&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cross</title>
		<link>http://jasonrutherford.com/2009/03/rock-band-competition-scoring/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Cross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonrutherford.com/?p=21#comment-6</guid>
		<description>On average when playing a song at medium difficulty I will get 97%. Switching to hard reduces this to 91%. That&#039;s a 3 point loss in execution for a 1 point gain in difficulty level. 
The increase in diffculty between easy-&gt;medium, medium-&gt;hard, and hard-&gt;expert is not identical and I think the equation needs some work in that area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On average when playing a song at medium difficulty I will get 97%. Switching to hard reduces this to 91%. That&#8217;s a 3 point loss in execution for a 1 point gain in difficulty level.<br />
The increase in diffculty between easy-&gt;medium, medium-&gt;hard, and hard-&gt;expert is not identical and I think the equation needs some work in that area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff</title>
		<link>http://jasonrutherford.com/2009/03/rock-band-competition-scoring/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 06:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonrutherford.com/?p=21#comment-2</guid>
		<description>The current formula is a good start, better than what I&#039;ve seen at other tournaments. However, there is a flaw in your Instrument Score. Under the current system, drumming Ace of Spades on Medium would net you 7 points (1 + 6 = 6), as would drumming Interstate Love Song on Expert (3 + 4 = 7). These two experiences are not equal, but under your system they would be. I suggest changing the formula like so:

Instrument Score = (Difficulty Level x Song Rating)

And changing the Difficulty Level values such that Easy = 1 and Expert = 4 and doing the same for Song Rating (no circles = 1, demon heads = 7). You could then scale it to make it worth about the same as song execution (dividing the score by 3 brings the max to 37.3, you could fiddle with the numbers to make them nicer). Under this formula, Medium drumming Ace of Spades is worth 14 points (2 x 7 = 14) and Expert Drumming Interstate Love Song is worth 20 (4 x 5 = 20), which I think is closer to the actual difference in difficulty.

Sorry for giving you a long-winded, more complicated potential solution to your scoring woes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The current formula is a good start, better than what I&#8217;ve seen at other tournaments. However, there is a flaw in your Instrument Score. Under the current system, drumming Ace of Spades on Medium would net you 7 points (1 + 6 = 6), as would drumming Interstate Love Song on Expert (3 + 4 = 7). These two experiences are not equal, but under your system they would be. I suggest changing the formula like so:</p>
<p>Instrument Score = (Difficulty Level x Song Rating)</p>
<p>And changing the Difficulty Level values such that Easy = 1 and Expert = 4 and doing the same for Song Rating (no circles = 1, demon heads = 7). You could then scale it to make it worth about the same as song execution (dividing the score by 3 brings the max to 37.3, you could fiddle with the numbers to make them nicer). Under this formula, Medium drumming Ace of Spades is worth 14 points (2 x 7 = 14) and Expert Drumming Interstate Love Song is worth 20 (4 x 5 = 20), which I think is closer to the actual difference in difficulty.</p>
<p>Sorry for giving you a long-winded, more complicated potential solution to your scoring woes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
